Clinical relevance of current materials for cranial implants Towards an optimal patient-specific implant material (2019)

Clinical relevance of current materials for cranial implants Towards an optimal patient-specific implant material (2019)

Clinical relevance of current materials for cranial implants Towards an optimal patient-specific implant material (2019)

Clinical relevance of current materials for cranial implants Towards an optimal patient-specific implant material (2019)

 

Objective: The best material choice for cranioplasty following craniectomy remains a subject to discussion. Complication rates after cranioplasty tend to be high. Computer-assisted 3-dimensional modeling of poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) was recently introduced for cranial reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient- and surgery-related characteristics and risk factors that predispose patients to cranioplasty complications.

Material and methods: This retrospective study included a total of 40 cranial PEEK implants in 38 patients, performed at two reference centers in the Netherlands from 2011 to 2014. Complications were registered and patient- and surgery-related data were carefully analysed.

Results: The overall complication rate of PEEK cranioplasty was 28%. Complications included infection (13 %), postoperative hematoma (10 %), cerebrospinal fluid leak (2.5 %) and wound-related problems (2.5 %). All postoperative infections required removal of the implant. Nonetheless removed implants could be successfully re-used after re-sterilization.

Conclusion: Although overall complication rates after PEEK cranioplasty remain high, outcomes are satisfactory, as our results compare favorably to recent literature reports on cranial vault reconstruction.

 

ارسال نظر

آدرس ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد.